Typos of Greg L Bahnsen’s ‘By This Standard’

I’m working my way through Bahnsen’s By This Standard, which is an argument that the relationship between God’s ethics for us today and Old Testament law are characterized generally by continuity rather than discontinuity. The online copy I am reading through can be found in PDF form here. This page will be used to accumulate the typographical errors of the PDF. The typos will be presented in the form page number: incorrect line > correction. Page numbers throughout are counted according to the page number of printed book, with the PDF page number in parentheses:

74(101): man” (Rem. 7:22). > Rom.

75(102): law” (Rem. 3:31). > Rom.

76(103): fillment of the law” (Rem. 13:10). > Rom.

90(117): (Mark 10:19), and “Thou shah not > shalt not

96(123): eous” (Rem. 7:12). > Rom.

96(123): counted righteous (Rem. 2:13).

99(126): model of all righteousness. The faithfhl descrii in > faithful described(?)

100(127): self,He makes {s /to&— > self, He makes us holy

103(130): and righteous, and good” (Rem. 7:12) > Rom.

105(132): ness, receive with meekness the implanted w-oral, > word

108(134): ethical theme, we might have expected different y. > differently (?)

109(135): dishonoring God (Rem. 2:17-18, 23). And John > Rom.

109(135): in Christ Jesus unto. good works, which God before > unto good

110(136): Testament law (w. 18-19). > vv.

112(138): of the tongue, James tells us that if an y man does not > any

117(144): and binding character from the law of “God which > law of God

117(144): tempt to understand these concepts apart J-em the > apart from

119(146): without challenge in manv thmw.s of New Testament > in many themes of

130(157): care for one’s enemies (Matt. 5:44; Rem. 12:20, > Rom.

133(160): that the ‘law brings blessings to those who heed it? > the law

134(161): it y over us. No extra-biblical standard, reason, or > ity over

135(162): to be doers of-the law > of the

141(168): ing the case law against homosexuality y (Lev. 18:23) > homosexuality (Lev. 18:23)

141(168): Commandments (for example, Rem. 1:32, where > Rom.

142(169): (B) Gods law > God’s law

144(171): by law–obedience > by law-obedience

144(171): “if righteousness is through the law’, then Christ died > law, then

144(171): deeming and delivering His people from ‘bondage > from bondage

145(172): which is to come. he indicates that the law of God is > come, he

147(174): #de who enjoyed thepromtie ought to obg the law oj God. It > ple who enjoyed the promise ought to obey the law of God

147(174): (Rem. 8:3-4). Therefore, we observe that the promise > Rom.

149(176): law of God after the inward man” (Rem. 7:22) > Rom.

157(184): nant believer to God’s law is s gnificantly different > significantly

157(184): from that of the Old Covenanz believer. Since the > Covenant

157(184): veil has been tom > torn

158(185): glory was “passing away” (w. 7, 11, 13) > (vv. 7, 11, 13)

158(185): joice in our hope of sharing the glory of God” (Rem. > Rom.

159(186): ment. The New Covenant puts t le law into proper > the law

159(186): ple, Jas. 3:13-18), its prayers (-or example. Acts > for example,

Related Posts:

This entry was posted in uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 characters available

Subscribe without commenting

  • Archives